Migrating to SAP S/4HANA is more than a technical upgrade – it’s a strategic business move. This next-generation ERP offers the chance to reimagine how your business runs, streamline outdated processes, and unlock new capabilities. It’s also becoming unavoidable: SAP will end mainstream support for ECC, making the move to S/4HANA essential for stability and compliance. After that date, companies sticking with legacy systems will be left without official support – “in the dust,” as Iftekhar Hossain puts it. Beyond support, SAP is focusing all innovation on S/4HANA, meaning new features (especially around AI and analytics) will only be available to S/4HANA users. Delaying migration could put your organisation at a competitive disadvantage as others leap ahead with modern capabilities.

For project managers, an S/4HANA migration presents a daunting challenge. These projects are often the largest IT undertakings in years, touching multiple business units, data sources, and processes. They come with tight timelines, significant costs, and high expectations from the business. In fact, nearly half of ERP projects of this scale fail to meet their time and budget goals. Common challenges include aligning IT and business stakeholders, managing complex data migrations, handling resistance to change, and avoiding disruption to ongoing operations. Project managers must juggle shifting priorities and constant pressure – a bit like herding cats (a futile attempt to control or organise a class of entities which are inherently uncontrollable) on a rollercoaster. It’s no surprise if you find the prospect of migration both critical and intimidating.

This is where the Fast Implementation Track (FIT) comes in. FIT provides a structured yet flexible approach to S/4HANA projects, built on five key pillars: Focus, Communicate, Simplify, Commit, and Educate. Rather than “winging it” and hoping for the best, F.I.T. offers a roadmap to navigate the chaos. As one veteran SAP program manager noted after 25 years in the trenches, SAP projects have predictable patterns and pitfalls – but “here’s the kicker: it doesn’t have to be that way”. With the right framework, you can flip the script, take control, and deliver real business value. In the sections that follow, we’ll explore how each FIT pillar helps project managers lead a successful S/4HANA migration. We’ll also address common pitfalls (and how to overcome them) and outline a strategic approach to the overall migration journey. By the end, you should have a clearer game plan for steering your S/4HANA project to a win – no more firefighting or last-minute panics, just a well-orchestrated transformation that you and your stakeholders can celebrate.

---

The Five FIT Components in Action

Focus, Communicate, Simplify, Commit, and Educate are the five FIT components that anchor a fast and effective S/4HANA implementation.

Let’s look at each pillar in action and how it directly helps project managers (and their consulting teams) drive success.

Focus

Focus is about concentrating on what truly matters for the business. In an S/4HANA migration, it’s easy to get lost in a sea of features, customisations, and conflicting opinions. The FIT approach insists that you cut through the noise and identify the key business processes that will deliver real impact. SAP S/4HANA isn’t implemented for its own sake or for “fancy features”; it’s implemented to make the company run better.

You should work with stakeholders to pinpoint the most critical events and processes in your business – the ones that keep the lights on and drive value (e.g. sales, procurement, manufacturing, financial closing). Ensure everyone agrees on these priorities. If they don’t, that misalignment is your starting point for discussion.

By establishing a clear vision of what success looks like (in business terms), you align IT and business teams on a common goal. This clarity of focus prevents the project from becoming an “IT-only” upgrade. Instead, it becomes a business transformation aimed at making work faster, easier, and more efficient for everyone.

In practice, maintaining focus might mean deferring non-essential requirements to a later phase, so the team can concentrate on delivering the highest-value improvements first. Like a Stoic planning for what’s important and ignoring the trivial, a focused project manager steers the team towards outcomes that truly move the needle.

Communicate

If “communication” sounds obvious, that’s because it’s often said – yet true communication is often lacking. In FIT, Communicate means creating clarity and buy-in through effective messaging and listening. It’s not enough to rattle off status updates or send mass emails. Communication in a migration project should be a two-way street and an ongoing dialogue.

You need to articulate the vision and progress in language each stakeholder understands. This might involve translating technical jargon into business impacts for executives, or explaining process changes in simple, relevant terms for end-users on the warehouse floor. It also means ensuring people really understand what’s being asked of them – how often have we seen nodding heads in meetings, but later discovered everyone had a different interpretation?

FIT reminds us that just saying something louder doesn’t guarantee comprehension. Verify the message: encourage questions, repeat back what was heard, and use visuals or examples to cement understanding.

Good communication also entails listening to concerns from all levels. By fostering an environment where each voice matters, you as the PM can catch issues early, address misconceptions, and build trust. In short, make communication meaningful. When people feel heard and informed, their buy-in increases – and an S/4HANA project with broad buy-in is far more likely to succeed than one driven in a silo. As a light-hearted example, think of yourself as an orchestra conductor with a big pair of ears: you’re not there to play every instrument, but you must ensure all sections are in harmony and hearing the same beat.

Simplify

Enterprise software projects notoriously become complex beasts. The Simplify component urges you to keep things as simple as possible. In the context of S/4HANA, this often translates to avoiding unnecessary customisation and sticking to standard best practices whenever you can. The allure of custom tweaks to match every legacy quirk can be intoxicating – many teams feel an urge to rebuild the new system to mirror the old. But that’s exactly how projects go off the rails.

Every custom code or bespoke process you add is another potential point of failure, another thing to test, and a departure from SAP’s standard (which can complicate future upgrades). FIT champions a “less is more” philosophy. Challenge each requested customisation: is it truly needed, or are we better off adjusting the business process to fit the standard solution?

Often, what seemed like a must-have requirement may be a habit from the old system that can be optimized or even eliminated with S/4HANA’s modern capabilities. Remember that S/4HANA comes with SAP Best Practices – proven processes that SAP has designed for efficiency.

By simplifying and adopting standard functions, you not only speed up the implementation but also make the system easier to use and maintain. As the F.I.T. guidance notes, you’ll “look like a genius when you deliver a straightforward, effective solution that doesn’t require a 300-page manual to operate.” In other words, simplicity drives user adoption and long-term agility.

Adopting pragmatism here means accepting that we can’t (and shouldn’t) control or customise everything. Instead, focus on the core needs and let go of the rest. This approach helps avoid the rabbit hole of complexity and keeps the project scope lean and manageable.

Commit

Commit in FIT refers to securing commitment at all levels – especially leadership – and keeping that commitment strong throughout the project. Large-scale migrations require significant resources (budget, people, time) and often involve tough decisions (e.g. freezing certain projects, reassigning top employees to the project team, etc.).

You must ensure senior leadership is not just paying lip service, but actively backing the project. This means framing the S/4HANA implementation as an opportunity, not just an expense. For example, build a business case that highlights transformative ROI – how the new system will enable growth, efficiency, cost savings, better analytics, or other strategic benefits.

When executives see the migration as a game-changer for the business (and not a costly technical tweak), they’re more likely to rally behind it with enthusiasm and necessary support. True commitment is demonstrated by actions: assigning capable business users to assist IT, dedicating budget for change management and training, and visibly championing the project in company communications.

Commitment is also crucial at the team level. Mid-project, when challenges arise (and they will arise), half-hearted support won’t cut it. FIT reminds us that change management isn’t just a box to tick at the end – it’s the glue holding the whole initiative together.

You’ll need managers who are prepared to make decisions and stick with them, and end-users who are engaged rather than dragged along. Cultivate a sense of shared ownership: celebrate milestones, acknowledge contributions, and keep reiterating the why of the project.

One principle to invoke here is perseverance: when setbacks happen, committed leaders don’t throw up their hands – they adapt and press on with resilience. Similarly, encourage your sponsors and team to see the migration through to the end, keeping the ultimate benefits in mind during tough times. In short, get everyone on the boat, rowing in the same direction – and make sure the captain (leadership sponsor) is clearly at the helm supporting you.

Educate

Technology projects are ultimately about people. The Educate component underscores the need to prepare and empower the users who will live with the new S/4HANA system. A system is only as good as the people using it, so it’s critical to invest in training and enablement throughout the project lifecycle.

Rather than treating training as an afterthought (e.g. a few rushed sessions right before go-live), FIT integrates education into every phase. For example, during design and testing, include key end-users in workshops so they learn by doing and provide feedback. Develop simple, role-based training materials early, and update them as the system evolves. By the time go-live arrives, your workforce should feel excited and confident with the new system, not anxious or clueless. This proactive approach prevents the dreaded scenario of a “successful” technical go-live that fails because no one knows how to do their job in the new system.

Education is not a mere tick-box exercise or a one-way lecture. It’s about engagement and making the change tangible for people. Consider running demos or simulations that show each department how their daily work will improve with S/4HANA – before they even ask for it. This creates buy-in by helping staff visualize the benefits and get comfortable early.

Additionally, identify change champions or super-users in each business area and invest in deeper training for them; they will become your local gurus who can support their peers on the job. When users feel prepared, they resist less and even become advocates for the new system. FIT’s Educate component essentially says: empower your people. After all, an ERP migration is as much a people transformation as a technology one.

If done right, by launch day your team is not only ready to use S/4HANA – they’re raring to go, confident that they can handle whatever comes next. And for a project manager, there’s no better sight than seeing colleagues embrace the new system rather than fear it. (It’s the polar opposite of tossing them a thick manual and wishing them good luck!)

---

Common Pitfalls and How to Overcome Them

Even with a solid methodology like FIT, there are pitfalls that can trip up an S/4HANA migration. Let’s highlight a few common ones project managers should watch out for, and discuss how to overcome them:

• Misalignment between IT and Business Goals: One of the biggest mistakes is treating S/4HANA purely as a technical upgrade without a clear business vision. If IT and business stakeholders lack alignment, the project can turn into a tug-of-war. Symptoms include conflicting priorities, scope creep, and teams “rebuilding the old system in the new one” because no one agreed on a better way. The antidote is establishing a shared vision and objectives from the outset (recall the Focus component). Ensure C-suite executives and business process owners are involved in defining success criteria. For example, is the goal to speed up financial reporting from 5 days to 2 days? To enable real-time inventory insights? Make these targets explicit. A strong vision aligns everyone and prevents the project from defaulting to status quo processes. Facilitate workshops to get IT and business on the same page, and use the vision as a North Star whenever tough decisions arise. By keeping business value at the centre, you’ll avoid the misalignment trap.
• Resistance to Change within Teams: Change is hard – and an ERP migration can trigger anxiety and pushback from employees. Users who have mastered the current system may fear the new one, or simply be reluctant to alter their routines. Additionally, middle managers might worry about disruptions to their department’s performance. This can manifest as subtle sabotage (delays in providing information, low engagement in training) or open criticism of the project. Another aspect is the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” mentality, which leads to clinging to legacy customs and customisations. In fact, unwillingness to leave the legacy behind and let go of customisations is noted as a top human-factor challenge in S/4HANA projects. Overcoming resistance requires a robust change management approach: clear communication (what’s changing and why it’s beneficial), involvement (give people a voice in design/testing as appropriate), and support (training, resources, and leadership encouragement). Highlight quick wins and benefits early – for instance, show a demo of a simplified approval workflow or an improved user interface that addresses a common pain point. When people see improvements that make their jobs easier, their rational side kicks in and resistance often softens. Also, acknowledge the emotional side of change: be patient, listen to concerns, and provide reassurance. Essentially, lead with empathy and reason. Over time, by Educating and Communicating (two of FIT components), you can turn resistance into acceptance and even enthusiasm. Remember, today’s sceptic might be tomorrow’s power user, given the right guidance.
• Over-Engineering and Unnecessary Complexity: It’s a familiar story – a team gets carried away with endless enhancements, custom reports, and “gold-plating” the new system, only to find they’ve created a monster. Over-engineering often comes from a good place (wanting the best for the business), but it defeats the purpose of a “clean” S/4HANA system and can derail the project timeline. We’ve touched on this in Simplify, but it bears repeating as a pitfall: trying to carry over every historic custom feature or building overly complex processes in S/4HANA can lead to budget blowouts and fragile solutions. A telltale sign is when testing uncovers a web of errors because of all the interdependencies introduced by custom code. To overcome this, enforce a strict value filter on requirements: each feature should have a clear business justification. Leverage SAP standard best practices as much as possible, and challenge the mantra of “we’ve always done it this way.” Sometimes, it’s better to adapt a business process to fit the tool, rather than bending the tool to fit the process. If you encounter stakeholders advocating for a heavily customised approach, bring data or case studies to the table: for example, mention that sticking to standard can reduce implementation time and cost significantly, and that custom code can increase the long-term maintenance burden. You might even use a bit of humour – e.g. “We don’t want to create the Franken-system (making technologies work together when they weren’t designed to work together) that only its creators understand, right?”. By keeping the design as simple as possible, you’ll maintain flexibility, reduce risk, and set the stage for easier upgrades in the future. In short: don’t over-engineer – over-deliver (value, that is). Simplify now to avoid headaches later.

---

A Strategic Approach to SAP S/4HANA Migration

With the FIT components guiding the project’s mindset, let’s zoom out and consider the overall strategy for the S/4HANA migration. This section covers selecting the right migration path, aligning the project with business strategy, and balancing efficiency with agility in execution.

Selecting the Right Migration Path: Brownfield, Greenfield, or Bluefield

One of the first strategic decisions is how you will migrate to S/4HANA. There are three primary paths:

• Greenfield – New Implementation: A greenfield approach treats the migration as a completely new ERP implementation. You set up a fresh S/4HANA system and migrate (some) data from the old system, but essentially start with a clean slate.
  Pros: This allows you to reengineer and optimise processes from scratch, adopting modern best practices without being constrained by how things were done in the past. It’s great if your current processes are outdated or if your existing system is heavily customised in unwieldy ways. You’re not tied to legacy baggage, which can lead to a leaner, more efficient operation going forward.
  Cons: A fresh implementation is time-consuming and costly. It requires more effort in design, data migration, and change management, since everything is effectively new for users. You might also risk losing some historical data or context (unless you migrate it or archive it separately) and need to train users extensively on wholly new processes.
  In short, greenfield is transformative but demands significant investment and buy-in. It’s like building a new house – you get to design it how you want, but it takes more time and money than renovating the old one.
• Brownfield – System Conversion: A brownfield approach converts your existing SAP ECC system in-place to S/4HANA. Think of it as a technical upgrade combined with a data migration on the same system landscape.
  Pros: It lets you keep your existing processes and customisations (for better or worse), which means less disruption in the short term. The project can be faster and carry less risk to operations because you’re not redesigning everything – you retain what works and simply migrate it to the new platform. For organisations that are relatively happy with their current processes or have heavily tailored systems they rely on, this “lift-and-shift” can appear safer.
  Cons: The very fact that you carry over the old setup is also the biggest drawback – you might be bringing inefficiencies and technical debt into S/4HANA. If some processes were suboptimal or custom code wasn’t compatible, you’ll have to fix those anyway, possibly under time pressure.
  Essentially, brownfield might get you to S/4HANA faster, but without delivering much business improvement if you’re not careful. It’s akin to renovating an old house’s foundation: quicker than building new, but if there are cracks, you patch them as you go and you may not get a modern design. Brownfield requires very thorough testing of all existing functions to ensure nothing breaks during conversion.
• Bluefield – Selective Hybrid: The “Bluefield” approach is often described as a hybrid of the above, taking the best of both worlds. In a Bluefield (or sometimes called selective data transition), you migrate only selected data and processes to the new system. For example, you might start with a new S/4HANA system (like greenfield) but load it with your company’s master data and open transactions, and perhaps bring over certain configuration or custom code that you know is essential. You can also consolidate multiple systems into one in this approach.
  Pros: It’s flexible – you retain what is useful (customisations or historical data that add value) and drop what isn’t. This can reduce the bloat in your new system. It’s a fully documented and controlled migration, often supported by specialised tools, allowing you to execute in phases if needed. For example, you could move one business unit at a time or one module at a time. Bluefield can be faster than pure greenfield (since you’re not reinventing absolutely everything) but more transformative than pure brownfield (since you have the liberty to change things where it makes sense).
  Cons: It requires careful scoping of what to bring over and what to leave. This approach can be complex to plan and execute, and you’ll likely need expert help or software tools to do it right. Essentially, it’s like moving to a new house but only taking the furniture you really need – you must decide what to keep or discard.
  When done well, Bluefield can deliver a balanced outcome: a mostly clean system that still preserves critical legacy elements. It’s growing in popularity for those reasons, especially in large enterprises that can’t afford a giant bang-big-bang cutover for everything at once.

Choosing the right path depends on your organisation’s context:

• If you desire a complete transformation and your current state is holding you back, Greenfield might be worth the investment.
• If you need a fast technical upgrade and have limited appetite for change (at least initially), Brownfield could be suitable – but plan to continuously improve post-migration to address remaining pain points.
• If you want to balance risk and innovation, consider a Bluefield approach, possibly starting with a pilot or a particular scope to prove the approach.

Importantly, this isn’t purely an IT decision – it’s a business decision. Weigh factors like cost, downtime tolerance, regulatory/reporting needs for historical data, and the organisation’s change readiness. For instance, a company with relatively standard processes and a workforce open to change might lean Greenfield to take full advantage of S/4HANA’s innovations. Conversely, a company with highly unique processes that are a source of competitive advantage might preserve those via Brownfield or selective migration (ensuring those critical customisations are reimplemented in S/4 if needed). In many cases, engaging a system integrator or consulting partner to perform an assessment can help determine the best fit path. Whichever path you choose, make sure it’s aligned with your business strategy and capacity – it will set the tone for the entire project.

Aligning Project Goals with Business Impact

A successful S/4HANA migration is one that delivers tangible business benefits, not just a technical go-live. As project manager, you should continually align project goals with the organisation’s broader business objectives. Every major project decision should trace back to a “Why does this matter for the business?” For example, if a goal of the company is to improve customer satisfaction, how will S/4HANA enable that? Perhaps by enabling faster order fulfillment or more accurate invoicing – tie those outcomes to specific project deliverables (like implementing advanced Available-to-Promise in S/4, or automating billing processes). This alignment ensures that the project isn’t happening in a vacuum; it is directly contributing to business strategy.

One practical step is to define Key Business KPIs at the start of the project that the S/4HANA migration should improve. These could be process cycle times, error rates, financial closing speed, inventory turnover, IT cost reductions, etc. Make them as measurable as possible. Then, design the project plan to achieve improvements in those KPIs. For instance, if one KPI is reducing Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) in Accounts Receivable, the project might include implementing new credit management and collections functionality in S/4HANA and re-training the finance team on best practices to use it. By focusing on KPIs, you give the team a clear target and a way to gauge success beyond just “system is live.”

Regularly communicate these business targets and track progress. When tough choices come up (and they will – like de-scoping a feature due to time constraints), refer back to the business impact: will cutting this feature significantly harm our KPI improvement? If not, maybe it’s safe to drop; if yes, protect it. This helps in making rational, value-based decisions rather than emotional or political ones. As one blog nicely put it, “Migrating to S/4HANA is a strategic move, not just an IT upgrade. It’s an opportunity to reimagine how your business runs… and unlock potential you might not even realize exists.” Keeping this principle in mind will anchor your project in business value.

Another aspect of aligning to business impact is stakeholder mapping. Ensure you have business sponsors for each major area of change. For example, if part of the project will overhaul supply chain processes, the Head of Supply Chain should be a key stakeholder who champions those changes and ensures they deliver the expected business outcomes (like lower stock-outs or faster deliveries). This partnership between IT and business is the cornerstone of alignment. If ever IT goals (e.g., “we must migrate database X by this date”) start diverging from business goals (e.g., “we can’t have warehouse operations down at that time”), it’s your role to convene discussions and realign – find solutions that satisfy both or compromises that the business can accept. Misalignment can otherwise lead to scenarios where, say, IT pushes a change that operations quietly workaround or resist, undermining the benefits.

In summary, make the business the hero of the story. The S/4HANA project is not about implementing software; it’s about enabling the business to run better. Keep drawing that line of sight from project activities to business results. This not only ensures you deliver impact, but also helps maintain executive commitment (as leadership will see the project contributing to their goals) and user adoption (people see improvements that matter in their work).

Driving Efficiency While Maintaining Agility

Efficiency and agility are both vital to a successful S/4HANA migration, but they can seem at odds. Efficiency calls for structured planning, consistency, and avoiding waste; agility calls for flexibility, quick adaptation, and iterative learning. A balanced approach is ideal. You want a well-thought-out plan (so the project runs like a well-oiled machine), yet you also want the ability to respond to new information and change course rationally when needed.

How to achieve both? One way is to use a hybrid implementation methodology. SAP’s recommended approach, SAP Activate, embodies this mix: it provides a structured sequence (Discover, Prepare, Explore, Realize, Deploy, Run) and best practices content, while encouraging agile techniques like iterative build sprints and frequent validation with business users. In practice, this means you have an overall project roadmap (with efficiency in phases and workstreams), but within that, you operate in an agile manner – delivering increments of functionality, getting feedback, and adjusting as necessary. For example, in the Explore/Realize phases, instead of finalising 100% perfect specifications then building, you might configure a baseline solution quickly, demo it to key users, and refine it in cycles. This prevents analysis-paralysis (boosting efficiency) and ensures the solution actually meets business needs (thanks to agility). It’s the “tight feedback loop” concept.

Another tactic is phased go-lives or a rolling migration. Rather than a big bang where everything goes live at once (which is high risk and can be inefficient if problems arise), consider splitting the migration into logical phases – perhaps by module, business unit, or geographical region. This spreads the effort and allows lessons from early phases to improve later ones. For instance, go-live with the Finance module first in a quieter period, iron out any issues, then bring on Sales and Logistics next. This staged approach requires careful planning (to avoid breaking end-to-end processes), but if done well, it provides agility – you can adapt the plan after each phase based on what you learned, thereby improving efficiency for subsequent phases. It’s a bit like steering a large ship via small course corrections rather than trying to do one dramatic turn.

Maintaining agility also means being prepared for change requests or new requirements. Despite best efforts at scope control, businesses evolve. Perhaps during the project a new regulatory requirement emerges, or a competitor move forces a business process change. Build some contingency into your plan – time buffers, budget reserves – to handle the unexpected without derailing everything. When such changes come, address them calmly and logically: assess the impact, adjust priorities if necessary, and keep stakeholders informed. In essence, expect the unexpected and don’t panic when it happens. The Stoics advised focusing on what is within our control – in a project, you can’t control external events, but you can control your response and preparedness.

Efficiency can be driven by automation and tools as well. Use the available SAP tools for data migration, testing, and process management to speed things up. For example, automated testing scripts can greatly increase efficiency in the Realize phase by quickly pinpointing issues after each system update. Similarly, using SAP’s Best Practice content (pre-configured processes) can jump-start your project so you’re not reinventing the wheel for common scenarios – this accelerates delivery while maintaining a standard (efficient) approach.

Finally, make decisions based on data and evidence whenever possible, rather than gut feel or politics. If an integration test shows that a certain interface is failing frequently and slowing the team down, allocate resources to fix it properly rather than continuously applying Band-Aids, even if some stakeholders are impatient to move on. If user feedback from a pilot indicates a particular new process is too slow, don’t dismiss it – investigate and adjust the design if needed. By being responsive to reality (agility) while sticking to a disciplined execution process (efficiency), you’ll navigate to a successful outcome. One consulting insight phrased it well: in high-stakes projects, decisions driven by emotions or ego can lead to costly mistakes – instead, ensure decisions are grounded in facts and clear analysis. That approach epitomises maintaining agility (open to change) without losing efficiency (structured, fact-based management).

In summary, plan rigorously, execute flexibly. Have your roadmap and governance in place (so the project runs efficiently), but empower your team to iterate and improve (so you remain agile). This way, you can achieve a smooth migration journey that doesn’t waste effort, yet can course-correct as needed to hit the mark.

---

Conclusion

SAP S/4HANA migration is a journey that tests an organisation’s leadership, vision, and resilience. As a project manager, you are at the forefront of this transformation – a modern-day navigator steering the ship through changing seas. It’s a role that goes beyond task lists and status reports; you are leading a fundamental change in how the business operates. By applying the FIT components – Focus, Communicate, Simplify, Commit, Educate – you create a strong foundation for success. You ensure that everyone knows the destination and the route (Focus and Communicate), you keep the ship light and nimble (Simplify), you have the wind of leadership backing your sails (Commit), and your crew is trained and ready for anything (Educate).

Of course, even the best captains face storms. Common pitfalls like misalignment, resistance, and over-complexity will challenge you, but forewarned is forearmed. With a clear vision and rational decision-making, you can address these issues head-on – aligning stakeholders around business goals, engaging and supporting your people through change, and keeping the solution as clean as possible. When difficulties arise, remain calm and carry on – literally. The project manager who can stay composed and objective under pressure will guide the team to do the same. In the throes of a critical data migration or an unexpected go-live glitch, your steady leadership (perhaps channeling an inner Stoic calm) will make the difference between knee-jerk reactions and effective solutions.

FIT provides a structured yet flexible path that makes the migration journey smoother and more predictable. It’s not a magic wand to remove all complexity – but it is a compass that keeps you oriented toward success. By focusing on value, communicating clearly, simplifying where possible, securing commitment, and investing in people, you significantly increase the odds that your project will finish on time, on budget, and fit for purpose – the very promise of Fast Implementation Track. Instead of a chaotic scramble, your project can be a well-orchestrated process that puts you in the driver’s seat, delivering results that matter.

In closing, remember that an SAP S/4HANA migration is not just an IT endeavour; it’s a business transformation and a human transformation. You are the bridge between the technology and the people who use it, between the plan and the execution. Embrace that leadership role. Encourage your team to see the big picture and keep pushing forward, even when the going gets tough. Celebrate the small wins along the way – each successful test cycle, each legacy process improved, each user who says “hey, this new system isn’t so bad!” is a step toward victory.

Final takeaways

Lead with vision and purpose, stay focused on what you can control, and be prepared to adapt where you must. If you do that, you’ll not only deliver a successful S/4HANA migration – you’ll leave a legacy of a project that became a catalyst for positive change in your organisation. And as a professional, you’ll have marked yourself out as someone who can guide complexity to clarity. The road to S/4HANA may be challenging, but with the right approach, it’s absolutely one you can conquer. Now is the time to apply these principles, rally your troops, and set forth on the journey. In the words of an old proverb (and every project manager’s mantra): “Well begun is half done.” Begin with F.I.T. in mind and a steadfast commitment to success, and you’ll finish with a transformative result that you and your company can be proud of.

Onward and upward – S/4HANA awaits!